NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: FWPTMM5207 - Assess timber product designs for feasibility

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

FWPTMM5207 - Assess timber product designs for feasibility

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Analyse design objectives

  1. Identify design purpose and investigate potential market for the product
  2. Analyse intended production materials and processes
Identify design purpose and investigate potential market for the product

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyse intended production materials and processes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine design assessment criteria

  1. Establish criteria for assessment of product material options
  2. Establish criteria for assessment of product functionality
  3. Establish criteria for assessment of production process options, considering the impact of these on production operations
  4. Establish criteria for assessment of safety and potential liability issues
  5. Establish criteria for assessment of costs and marketability
  6. Determine weighting of scores for each criterion according to the importance of the issue
Establish criteria for assessment of product material options

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Establish criteria for assessment of product functionality

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Establish criteria for assessment of production process options, considering the impact of these on production operations

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Establish criteria for assessment of safety and potential liability issues

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Establish criteria for assessment of costs and marketability

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Determine weighting of scores for each criterion according to the importance of the issue

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apply the assessment criteria

  1. Select potential and actual products competing in the marketplace for comparative purposes
  2. Score and grade design against established criteria and record results
  3. Score and grade competing products against the established criteria and record results
  4. Record overall assessment results
Select potential and actual products competing in the marketplace for comparative purposes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Score and grade design against established criteria and record results

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Score and grade competing products against the established criteria and record results

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Record overall assessment results

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Establish feasibility and options

  1. Analyse assessment results for the design and competing products
  2. Reject designs that show poor assessment results and provide no potential for variation
  3. Identify designs that show poor assessment results but provide potential options for variation, and refer to appropriate personnel
  4. Identify designs that satisfy criteria and indicate the potential for success
  5. Conditionally endorse feasible designs, record conditions and refer to appropriate personnel
  6. Record assessment outcomes and maintain and process reports according to workplace procedures
Analyse assessment results for the design and competing products

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reject designs that show poor assessment results and provide no potential for variation

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify designs that show poor assessment results but provide potential options for variation, and refer to appropriate personnel

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identify designs that satisfy criteria and indicate the potential for success

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conditionally endorse feasible designs, record conditions and refer to appropriate personnel

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Record assessment outcomes and maintain and process reports according to workplace procedures

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Required Skills and Knowledge